I have never even considered doing this, and so my default answer is no, and my personal opinions are rather dull. So, I am simply going to respond to the information I am given. Most of the linked sources provided come from companies trying to sell me a product, so I am inclined not to trust them. I will respond to the last of them, however; a science paper is as neutral/helpful as I'm going to get with how the internet is.
Alright so, it seems legit, and it would be helpful to pool resources to where they are needed as opposed to guesswork but-- Personally? I don't care for it, I don't really want to know, and I don't want someone else to try to predict my future like a weatherman. I don't need it: I'm not having kids, and my family does not have a history of any genetic diseases. Thats my take-- sure, dull, and narrow.
As for future generations? I don't think they are going to get a choice, honestly. Science as a whole has turned to genetics like its some sort of star-child. "If we predict, and alter the very makeup of our being, if we can fix it, wouldn't that be something?" The very idea is so scientifically alluring, (I'm not saying it's not! It is!) that nearly every avenue of medicine is hurtling down it. This entire sequencing thing is gonna happen, and the future generations have more pressing concerns then working about it-- like, keeping the information it uncovers out of insurance provider's information banks. And global warming. And the slow and sure death of every species that doesn't profit us, or profit from us.
(pardon the close upload, Mendeley was refusing to load the citation)
Rahat B. at al (2017). Progress and Challenges in Precision Medicine. ScienceDirect. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128094112000155