Viktoria Solfronk

Viktoria Solfronk

by Deleted user -
Number of replies: 2

The reason that we can even discuss the idea of bringing a wooly mammoth back to life is because of CRISPR. CRISPR technology allows researchers to edit genes. This technology works because the protein Cas9 is an enzyme that can basically be used as scissors to cut out strands of DNA (Vidyasagar, 2018). In one article I read, the reason that it could be helpful to bring back the wooly mammoth is because it lived on the Siberian Steppe, which is a place that is covered in ice. But, as climate change alters the average temperatures, it has become warmer and the ice is starting to melt there. That is a problem because there is a vast amount of Carbon dioxide contained within the ice. So, if it is released, it would cause even more environmental issues. Researchers introduced animals that had been hunted off the Siberian Steppe back and saw that it significantly slowed the melting of the ice because the herbivores promote the growth of a type of grass that reflects light (Worrall, 2017). I think that one of the disadvantages to doing this would be that this has never been done before. It is hard to know what the outcome may be, good or bad. Also, the wooly mammoth tusks are extremely lucrative, so protecting them from poachers would be difficult. This would also be a hybrid with the Asian elephant, so it would not be just a Wooly Mammoth. Another reason it may be difficult to reintroduce them is that the environment is different than when they were not extinct, which might cause issues for their survival if it is not optimal for them. And finally, if we do that for the wooly mammoths, there could be a problem of reintroducing species that are no longer key in the ecosystem because they have been extinct for so long. I think that this could be a viable way to reintroduce recently extinct species that were affected by human interaction. But I think that bringing back species that have long since been extinct could pose threats to the current ecosystems.

 

Vidyasagar, A. (2018). What is CRISPR?

Worrall, S. (2017). We Could Resurrect the Wooly Mammoth. Here’s How.


369 words

In reply to Deleted user

Re: Viktoria Solfronk

by Deleted user -
Hello Viktoria, I agree with your disadvantages about bringing the wholly mammoth back. We just don’t know if it would be a good idea or not, it could be a very good thing, but it could also turn bad fast. I didn’t think about the poachers hunting the new mammoth-elephant hybrid. The scientist could make this awesome new animal and poachers could just come and kill them all if they are not protected correctly. I didn’t think about how reintroducing them back into the wild could be complicated. The environment isn’t the same as when they lived years ago, so the hybrid might not even be able to live in the area.

112 words

In reply to Deleted user

Re: Viktoria Solfronk

by Deleted user -
Hey Viktoria, I wholeheartedly agree with your last point that bringing back long extinct species could be detrimental to current ecosystems. Very rarely have humans in the past introduced a new species into an environment and have there be overall positive effects. It seems that the most sensible solution to any climate change or animal endangerment issue is not to bring about some sci-fi solution from thousands of years ago, but to just correct our mistakes and take away what is actually causing the negative things, specifically through environmental law and creating stronger restrictions on companies that take away or damage the earth in excess. I think if we tried that first, and it actually didn't work, I would be more open to the idea of bringing back the woolly mammoth.

131 words