Forum 6

Forum 6

by Deleted user -
Number of replies: 2

I think Jankui went along with the study because he wanted to see if he could actually edit genes. I think he wanted to prove that it could be done, ethical or not. I think that he should not have done this experiment this way. There are cures for HIV/AIDS, so I think it was a waste of time to do it on this since there has been so much research done. I get what he was trying to do, to prevent the babes from future disease but I don’t think it was necessary. Since the research is already finished, I guess I would want to see his scientific paper about the experiment and see how you can make that experiment ethical and medically needed for something else.

Comparing this experiment to the Tuskegee experiment, is that in the Tuskegee experiment they did not get informed consent but in Jankui’s experiment, he did get informed consent from the parents. In the Tuskegee experiment when they started it, they didn’t have a cure in 1932 but when the experiment was still going on in 1947, they found a cure, which was penicillin. Knowing they had a cure they didn’t tell the participants and a majority of them died from syphilis when they could have been healed. Comparing these two experiments, in my opinion the Tuskegee experiment was more unethical than Jankui experiment. Jankui’s experiment is still very new so we don’t know the side effects that could happen with the gene editing.

This experiment will have an effect on the opinion of science/medicine. I think people will not trust their medical doctors or the medical employees. In the Tuskegee experiment, a lot of African Americans don’t trust health care workers because of this experiment and the same effect will happen again because of Jankui’s experiment.

Li, J. (2019). Experiments that led to the first gene-edited babies: the ethical failings and the urgent need for better governance. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 20(1): 32-38. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6331330

Normile, D. (2018). CRISPR bombshell: Chinese researcher claims to have created gene-edited twins. Science mag. Retrieved from https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/11/crispr-bombshell-chinese-researcher-claims-have-created-gene-edited-twins

Nix, E. (2019). Tuskegee Experiment: The Infamous Syphilis Study. History Website. Retrieved from: https://www.history.com/news/the-infamous-40-year-tuskegee-study.


390 words

In reply to Deleted user

Re: Forum 6

by Deleted user -
Hey Natalie,
I completely agree with the fact you said he just wanted to prove it could be done, ethical or not. I feel like he didn't care about the safety of others while experimenting with people. I learned something new, I didn't know it was cures for AIDS/HIV. I also agree on how you said it wasn't necessary to do this type of research. But as you stated, I can see where he was coming from. I want to see all his notes, papers, research that he collected while completing this project. Yes, the Tuskegee was more unethical but I feel as if Jankui's experiment was more detrimental to society. A lot of Affrican American people don't trust the health care system and workers but I don't think its because of the Tuskegee experiment.

136 words

In reply to Deleted user

Re: Forum 6

by Deleted user -
Hey Natalie. I like what you said about how he just wanted to see if it could be done. Part of me thinks that maybe he did not fully realize the ethics of what he was doing because he was just curious to see if he could even complete an experiment like this in the first place. As far as the Tuskegee experiment goes, I completely agree that that experiment is far more unethical than this twin HIV experiment. In the Tuskegee experiment there were deaths that could have been fully prevented using the penicillin syphilis cure, whereas currently there are not side effects to that degree in the twin HIV experiment. That's not to say there could be in the future, but with the knowledge that we currently have it is reasonable to conclude that this experiment, while unethical, is not nearly as unethical as the Tuskegee experiment.

149 words