Does Rama really embody dharma? Or does Rama embrace the complex relationship between dharma, the gods, and humankind? In past discussions, we have discussed the similarities between Rama and Jesus. Essentially, both are human and god. This has made me view Rama in a different lens. I have never been a huge fan of Rama, especially in readings of other interpretations when Rama is Righteous Ram, but viewing the complexity of Rama throughout the story I am able to empathize with him a little more.
Lakshmana views Rama as the embodiment of dharma; as seen when he tells Hanuman about Rama, “This hero is the best of Dasaratha’s sons because of his many virtues. He is the refuge of all beings and he is devoted to carrying out his father’s wishes … I am devoted to Rama because of his many virtues, his graciousness and his immense learning. Rama, who deserves glory and every kind of happiness and is intent on the welfare of all creatures” (258). Lakshmana puts Rama up on this huge pedestal that I do not think Rama lives up to. We see Rama not live up to these high expectations a little bit farther in the story when he shoots Vali with an arrow from behind. Vali’s response to Rama perfectly shows this when he says, “What did you gain by shooting me in the back and killing me in this fashion? … All creatures say that you are noble and honourable, that your conduct is impeccable, that you are radiant and compassionate, devoted to the welfare of all beings, … I did not know then that you are, in fact, wicked and unethical, though you pretend to be honourable” (273). This is just a specific example I see relevant with Rama throughout the Ramayana. He does not live up to embodying dharma. Is Rama just an example of the inability for a human to perfectly encompass dharma?