Rich men

Rich men

by Deleted user -
Number of replies: 3

Valmiki’s Ramyana definitely benefits the upper classes of Brahmins and Kshatriyas, though specifically the Kshatriyas since Vishnu took on the form of a Kshatriya prince to embody Rama. It also, not surprisingly, is male oriented as can be seen through the multiple instances in which the male characters disregard or snub females throughout. 

Some of the very blatant themes are as follows: women should be obedient, devoted extensions of their husbands, not individuals, Dharma is hard to follow and often overlaps, and good will always conquer evil eventually.

 In terms of the first message I see this most clearly after Rama defeated Ravana and Rama refuses to accept Sita. He treats her as if she is his pet who has contracted a potential case of incurable flees--he only saved her to reaffirm his honor and defeat evil, but now he has no use for her or her potential grime since she is a part of him and could taint his purity. Because he doubts the status of this part of him, his wife, he cannot accept her (491). 

Early on when Rama is exiled, his mother and father encourage him not to leave by appealing to his sense of dharma (127). The dharma for husband, prince, and son become very intertwined in this instance. In the end though, Rama chooses exile despite all the other duties and obligations being equally valid paths. 

A tale as old as time itself, Rama is the embodied avatar of Vishnu on earth sent to rid the world of the evil Ravana who has wrought havoc on the gods for too long. Throughout the text there are smaller instances of this message. For example, Rama and Laksmana kill the raksasas as children (70). Controversially, Rama killed Vali (279). And eventually, Rama regains the throne (504). This only applies to the men in the story though, as Sita is rewarded with torment, public humiliation, and eventual return into the earth. 



In reply to Deleted user

Re: Rich men

by Deleted user -
Cosette, I totally agree with you. I strongly emphasized the context of "women should be obedient," as well. This theme continued throughout the entire story. Women are placed on the back-burner. I like how you characterized Sita as Rama's "pet." I believe he treated her as a piece of garbage. Sita, one that remained forever loyal, is still terribly treated. I love how you sarcastically applied the word, "rewarded," for her. What was Sita ever rewarded? Nothing. This story forgets women and their emotions, but men are fully acknowledged.
In reply to Deleted user

Re: Rich men

by Collin Cortinas -
Cosette,
Some good stuff here! I think it is very interesting that you touched on the good things only applying to men, this is very prevalent and I'm glad that you said it. Can you think of any other influential narratives throughout history that continue this story of men being rewarded for their good deeds while women continue to be punished?
In reply to Deleted user

Re: Rich men

by Deleted user -
Cosette, I think your analogy of Sita being Rama's pet is dead on. All throughout the Ramayana, Rama is this honorable divine-like man who is accepting and thoughtful and then right at the end as soon as he's achieved his goal he has been chasing after the whole book (of rescuing Sita) he does a complete one-eighty and rejects her. Which, thankfully, the gods were also taken aback at his behavior and were worried that he was becoming too human which was a somewhat relief. But it is completely exhausting to watch Sita and all of the women be put last. Even when Dasaratha visited Rama from the heavens it took him some convincing to forgive Kaikeyi. All of the women but especially Sita deserved better and was more than just an embellishment for the male characters.