Does anyone actually benefit other than Rama? I think it is very clear that men and upper castes all have the upper hand in this story. Even though Sita is one of the main characters, she is displayed as a damsel in distress the entire time. Even in the introduction, Sita is praised for her loyalty to Rama and this is how she displays her dharma (2). However, Rama doesn't believe she has been loyal to him, even though she was kidnapped because of Rama. Despite all she went through because of him, he doesn't comfort her after this trauma (490). Rama even tries to send her away. He doesn't trust her and her loyalty to him. He isn't there for her when she needs him the most. I think this really shows the true character of Rama. It also shows that there isn't a place for women in this story.
There is also little to no discussion about lower castes. It mostly warriors or people who have the gods on their sides for some special reason. Throughout the story, it seemed like everyone either was bending over backwards for Rama or they hated him and died. It seemed to really favor him, and there isn't much room for anyone else in this story. As for the rich men, this really who this story benefits. "Wealth gives access to pleasures and happiness, to the fulfillment of desires. It sustains a man's pride and allows him to cling to dharma" (463). Would Rama have been s successful if he wasn't a wealthy prince?