HIGH Gloss

HIGH Gloss

by Deleted user -
Number of replies: 4

I love Crash Course just as much as the next girl but there's just no way you can accurately fit the massive Ramayana in 13 minutes. Although, the attempt was impressive. With regards to the title of this post, they heavily glossed over the massive epic. First things first, Rama's skin isn't blue that's just symbolism for his celestial consciousness. I also think they didn't explain Kaiyeki cashing out on her boons well enough. Also Bharat never took the throne when Rama was gone. He got a promise from Rama that Rama would come back and rule after his exile so Bharat laid a pair of Rama's sandals at the foot of the throne in order to honor Rama. They also did not mention that Dashratha didn't send Rama away because of his own free will, he did it because of his dharma to honor his promise to Kaiyeki. This is only a piece of the things that I could comment on but I will move on. 

One thing I liked about this Crash Course was the question of who was the real hero of Ramayana and the avenues he explored with that. Obviously, I love Sita being the hero of the story and he actually made some very good points about how she dutifully honored herself and followed dharma. I also liked the option of Hanuman being the hero as well. They both gave up so much in order to aid Rama and his quests. 

Lastly, I think that Crash Course labelled the story of the Ramayana under "Mythology" because it is an American company and Eastern traditions are heavily misunderstood and misconstrued. I'm sure that many of the viewers of Crash Courses are mostly of the Western hemisphere and they do not understand that this is a religious and cultural text. Perhaps it was categorized under mythology for ease and clarity. The Ramayana also has many mythological and fantasy elements which perhaps is another reason why it was in this category. I don't think it should be in this category because I think it is a big disrespectful and insulting to those whose culture is so heavily centered around the Ramayana. 

In reply to Deleted user

Re: HIGH Gloss

by Deleted user -
Great discussion, KG! I especially love your last paragraph here talking about why they categorized it as mythology, because I think your analysis is right on the nose. There is a general unease in a lot of American circles when discussing Eastern traditions for a multitude of reasons, and that leads to a lot of misunderstandings/misinformation about the culture. I think this video aims to remove some of the connotations tied with the Ramayana by taking it out of its religious and cultural context to analyze just the narrative as mythology, but that does not in any way encompass the depth of the story and its significance.
In reply to Deleted user

Re: HIGH Gloss

by Deleted user -
KG, I understand what you are saying in regards to the use of "mythology" being harmful, but I believe that it is an accurate category. I don't believe there is anything inherently disrespectful about using "mythology" because it is a terminology that refers to a collection of myths with emphasis on those that belong to a particular religious or cultural tradition. It is a categorization that could be used for Western religions, as well, so I don't think it was meant with any ill intent.
In reply to Deleted user

Re: HIGH Gloss

by Deleted user -
Hey KG! You did a great job of examining this video! I agree, there are so many elements of the story that are glossed over in the Crash Course video. I like how you pointed out that the video did not fully explain why Dasharatha had to banish Ram. I also agree with you that labeling the Ramayana as mythology is a result of the fact that Crash Course is an American company, and that it is disrespectful to label it as such.
In reply to Deleted user

Re: HIGH Gloss

by Deleted user -
KG! I agree, this is a great place to start if you are really unfamiliar with this text. You can't fit all the details, and there is so much missing. I completely agree with your thoughts on calling this "mythology." It's not, and we shouldn't label this as mythology.