1. Introduction to the problem
2. Discussion of the two different creation stories to determine which warrants attention
3. Discussion of what Genesis 2-3 actually says in the Biblical canon (plot and grammar implications)
4. Modern interpretations of the story (mostly conservative though)
5. Implications this story has on women
6. Conclusion
I think the flow of my outline makes a lot of sense, first introducing the problem then working out where the trouble spots are and what all of the issues are. I think my paper would benefit from fleshing out the Modern Interpretations section to include more progressive or feminist interpretations of the story. I had originally planned on putting that section after the Implications on Women section to be like a "feminist response to the issue" to close out, but what do you guys think?