Discussion 2
2. I think it is fair for the federal government to place strict rules and restrictions on grants. This is because you need to have rules so the correct people are getting the money they deserve. Grants are sometimes free money, so if the government does not set rules, the people/states who would receive the money probably don't need it. I believe you cannot have a federal government without a state government. In my opinion, states can have their own laws, but they should also abide by some federal laws. For example, in North Carolina, there is a state tax so some people move to Florida with no state tax. There is no state tax in Florida because the state government implemented the law which was not set by the federal government.
3. If I could change anything about the constitutional design, I would give the states more power. The constitution shouldn't completely control our lives. Citizens should be able to make more decisions independently. State and federal governments must strike a balance between freedom and government policies. Considering today's society, there are some issues with the laws of the Constitution. The right to bear arms has been a contentious issue throughout the decades, and guns are a major concern. If you can manipulate it as a protective weapon and use it whenever you want, that is a huge concern. Balancing state and federal power is how nations thrive. As a nation and state, we would grow if both governments listened to their people and closed gaps to discrepancies.
3 replies
- Re: Discussion 2Gracyn, I like how you answered question 1. If a government is unable to adapt to a certain situation then how could you expect to apply it to a changing country? This ability to adapt is what makes federalism flexible. I also agree with your answer to question 2, grants can be received as "free money" so regulations on grants are needed to make sure they aren't given to the wrong people. Your answer to question 3 provided insight into topics I didn't think to apply the question to which I found interesting!
Post by Mary Marques
Re: Discussion 2I agree that a nation is not able to grow as a nation without flexibility and and adaptability. Also, I like the example you gave in your answer to question two about the state taxes in Florida vs. North Carolina. This was a good illustration of a states' ability to implement laws and policies.Post by Ethan Byron
Re: Discussion 2I agree with your response to question one, how a nation needs flexibility to adapt. I also agree with you on question two on how the government should stay in control of grants by placing certain rules and restrictions on them. I like how in number three you talked about how the states should be given more power, while listening to the people and "closing gaps and discrepancies."