Discussion 3
1. I agree that we should not restrict freedom of speech, but we should also not restrict consequences to our actions. I feel like a lot of people think our country is restricting freedom of speech more now due to political correctness and cancel culture, but no one is saying anyone “cannot” say something, only that you shouldn’t and that there will be consequences for doing so. I believe all Americans should have the right to critique our government without fearing for their safety or repercussions from politicians, but the problem arises when some people insist on the right to express hate. American’s have the right to share nonviolent hate, but risk losing their jobs, peers, or respect from doing so. This is not a violation of freedom of speech but is a consequence of sharing one’s personal views.
2. The right to privacy directly relates to our right to liberty. Liberty and independence allow for American citizens to be free from oppressive restrictions such as invasion of privacy. The ninth amendment protects rights not specifically outlined in the Constitution, like privacy. Privacy is also ensured in the fourth amendment that prevent unwarranted search and seizures. I understand that the government may think invading innocent people’s privacy in order to prevent one guilty person from acting may feel worth it, but invading those innocent’s people privacy is un-American and a violation of our freedoms.
3. Terrorism suspects are still humans, and our country does believe everyone is innocent until proven guilty, so suspects should still be treated humanely. However, dependent on the severity of terrorism, civilian trials may not be impartial nor equipped to handle trials as complex and consequential. American citizens suspected of terrorism trials should strive to be held in civilian courts, as the suspect is a civilian, but there will be extremes and exceptions. Suspects who are not Americans are still people often with families who may still be completely innocent, but they do not have the American right to due process, so civilian court may be much more complicated.