Write a reflective response (4-5 sentences each) to each of the three prompts below.
1. Kettl claims that federalism’s strength is its “enormous flexibility – its ability to adapt to new problems and political pressures.” Do you agree with this claim? Is flexibility a strength of federalism?
2. Kettl spends a lot of time discussing the federal government’s use of grants as one way to impose its will on the states. Do you think it’s fair that the federal government places strict rules and restrictions on grants, particularly those requirements not related to the purpose of the grant, that states must follow to receive the money? Is this a fair way for the federal government to impose its will or is it infringing upon the rights of state governments to govern themselves?
3. If you could change one aspect of the
constitutional design of federalism, what would you change and why? How would
you balance state power and federal power?
To add your reply, click "add a new discussion topic," type your response to each of the questions, and then make sure to click "post to forum." Then, check out some of your fellow classmate's responses and make sure to reply (as discussed in the syllabus) to at least two of your classmates' responses before 6/11.
2. I do think that it is fair for the federal government to place rules and restrictions on grants. It insures that the state and local governments are not abusing their power. It also ensures that the money is going towards what it is intended for and is not being overspent. It is an important compromise, and it guarantees that national goals are achieved.
3. I would make it so that there is more clarity about what powers the state and local governments have. I think that flexibility in the system is important. However, I think that there is too much conflict caused by the lack of clarity about what issues belong to state and local governments. Overall, I think that there needs to be better communication.