Typography and branding
What's a brand that you think uses typography very well?
What about a brand that doesn't use typography very well?
19 discussions
Tostitos has a very strange typography on their logo. The letters don't line up and it feels like it was thrown together.
I believe that Gap does not do typography well. Upon visiting the website, there are a lot of logo fonts that are overwhelming to the user.
Lululemon has great branding, but not a great logo. The logo is supposed to be an A which symbolizes "Athletically hip." Their brand exploits their logo, but their logo does not exploit their brand.
I cannot STAND the ecoiffier logo. The type is so ugly to me and does not make me want to buy their products at all. I get it is for little kids but it looks like a little kid designed it.
I also think that Powerade does not use branding well because the font and text are the same on all of their items.
Not well: INTEL; blends together and feels a bit outdated
Bad: Fanta https://www.fanta.com
Failure: Dunkin Donuts uses a sans serif rounded tip font that would probably look like comic sans in lowercase. The pink and orange grab your attention and could possibly be indicating sugar, but something about it looks wrong, like they just got a set of neon highlighters from the book fair.


I think a company that does bad branding is the Ebay. The Ebay logo is not a very standard logo. The different colors do grab attention but the letters are touching and don't seem to work well in my opinion.

A brand that I think uses typography well is Reebok. The serif on the B adds a nice movement to the bottom of the text that wouldn’t be present without it. It is exceptionally simple and follows conventions, which gives it a clean and orderly look. The heavy weight of the text is good in that it reflects the weight of the brand. Reebok advertises to people who tend to be enthusiastic about the tougher aspects of fitness, such as CrossFitters and UFC fans, and the heavy weight of the letters reflects their target market.

A brand that I do not think uses typography well is Diadora. Diadora is a European sportswear and shoe brand that has reentered the American market since its decline in the early 2000’s. I think that the choice to have zero aperture is clever, but I think it hurts the visibility of the word. If this was on a shoe, a viewer would have to strain to see the lines of the d’sand a’s. It makes the logo feel heavy and weighed down. Another aspect I do not like is the tittle above the I. I think it may be a little too far up and needs to be in line with another aspect, such as the ascender of the R. That is another problem I have with the typography, the ascender of the R. I think it is a little long. If it was a tad shorter, it could be in the center line of the A.
I'm not discontent about the typography of any logos that come to mind.

i find Ikea font simple and the build itself stands out more to me
Poor Typography: Ableton https://www.ableton.com/en/live/
Uber's original 2010 typography was on the wrong side of simple. The skinny lettering made the company look boring and did not engage the audience.
